08.05.25
An overwhelming show of support backing the Government’s Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations, has prompted the withdrawal of a Motion to Regret.
On 7 May, Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle tabled a Motion to Regret, criticising the Government’s Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations lack of consumer transparency and failure to consider devolved powers.
“but that this House regrets that the draft Regulations fail to provide consumers, farmers and landowners with sufficient information on genetically modified precision bred organisms, and fail to allow devolved authorities to implement their policy choices in areas where responsibility has been devolved to them,” said Bennett.
Despite the Motion to Regret, the debate saw overwhelming support from Peers for the Statutory Instruments. Lord Cameron of Dillington highlighted the urgent need for precision breeding to develop more resilient crops, while Lord Rooker clarified that precision breeding is not genetic modification and noted strong support from the scientific community.
Although she maintained her concerns, Baroness Bennett ultimately withdrew her Motion to Regret, acknowledging the broader support for the Government’s approach.
The ABC stand by the Peers support and reaffirm the scientific consensus on precision breeding, and encourage peers to focus on the benefits for food security, sustainability, and agricultural innovation.
Read the full debate transcription on the official UK Parliament website.
